The primary aim of a successful search should be to return the most useful result to the searcher. So it's interesting that a Google search should return Visa HQ as the number one result to a search for Qatar Visas made in Qatar.
Searching for visa information for UK residents in the UK returns this advice:
"Citizens of United Kingdom residing in United Kingdom have to apply for a visa to Qatar in person at the nearest consulate of Qatar in United Kingdom."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30a68/30a68cfc1547ca1680f7fa0bbc0c92d80242edd8" alt="Screengrab 2: Visa HQ result for Qatar Visa for British Citizen"
This is not just a mistake by Visa HQ - similar searches for other countries return exactly the same advice. Even the search for Qatar Visa for a Qatar citizen looking for a visa to Qatar!
"Citizens of Qatar residing in Qatar have to apply for a visa to Qatar in person at the nearest consulate of Qatar in Qatar."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8426/c8426c9484427d4dbb52b64705eb15c0007383f9" alt="Screengrab: Visa HQ result for Qatar Citizen searching for Qatar Visa to Qatar"
HQ is also a brand - and Google rates brands, as this quote from SEO Book blog shows:
"The internet is fast becoming a "cesspool" where false information thrives, Google CEO Eric Schmidt said yesterday.
'Brands are the solution, not the problem," Mr. Schmidt said. "Brands are how you sort out the cesspool.' "
Which is why you sometimes get a pile of rubbish on a brand site like Visa HQ rating above a valid web page such as Qatar Embassy's visa page, a government site providing valid visa information from the source, as well as our own regularly updated visa page.
Also see: Qatar Visas | Qatar Immigration: Turned Away at the Gates | Qatar Visa Forum | Police Clearance for Qatar
Tags
Qatar Internet visa